The Nightfall Group lawsuit refers primarily to a civil enforcement case brought by the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office against Ultimate Host, LLC, doing business as The Nightfall Group, and its owner and operator, Mokhtar Jabli.
The case centers on allegations that the company operated short-term rentals in Los Angeles properties in violation of the city’s short-term rental and party-house rules. The city also alleged that some properties were repeatedly used for large parties that caused noise, traffic, trash and other neighborhood problems.
The case is important because it involves Los Angeles’ efforts to enforce restrictions on short-term rentals and so-called party houses.
What Is the Nightfall Group?
The Nightfall Group is a luxury short-term rental and hospitality business associated with Ultimate Host, LLC. The company has marketed luxury homes and villas for short-term stays and events.
The Los Angeles lawsuit identified Ultimate Host, LLC, doing business as The Nightfall Group, as a defendant, along with owner and operator Mokhtar Jabli and three property owners.
The company is separate from the many individual property owners whose homes may have been involved in particular rental arrangements.
Why Was Nightfall Group Sued?
The Los Angeles City Attorney filed the civil enforcement action on August 15, 2023.
The city alleged that Nightfall violated Los Angeles’:
- Short-Term Rental Ordinance
- Party House Ordinance
- Unfair competition laws
- Public nuisance laws
The city claimed that Nightfall operated numerous short-term rentals that did not comply with Los Angeles’ requirements for legal home sharing.
According to the City Attorney’s Office, police had been called to Nightfall-associated properties more than 250 times over a two-year period.
These allegations are claims made in the lawsuit and should not be treated as a court finding that every allegation was proven.
What Did Los Angeles Allege?
The city’s complaint focused on several alleged problems.
Illegal Short-Term Rentals
Los Angeles has specific rules governing short-term rentals.
The city alleged that Nightfall’s business model involved renting homes from property owners and then offering those properties to short-term guests.
According to the city, the properties did not meet the requirements of Los Angeles’ Home-Sharing Ordinance.
The city also alleged that Nightfall was operating hundreds of short-term rental properties rather than operating within the city’s restrictions for legal home sharing.
Party Houses
Another major part of the lawsuit involved allegations that some properties were being used for large parties.
The city alleged that gatherings resulted in:
- Excessive noise
- Large numbers of guests
- Traffic problems
- Street obstruction
- Trash
- Property damage
- Repeated police responses
The city characterized Nightfall as a significant contributor to Los Angeles’ party-house problem.
Public Nuisance Allegations
The lawsuit also included public-nuisance allegations.
The city argued that repeated disturbances associated with certain properties affected surrounding residents and created public-safety concerns.
Again, these were allegations contained in an enforcement action rather than a blanket judicial finding against all Nightfall properties.
Nightfall Group Lawsuit Case Number
The Los Angeles case is listed as:
The People of the State of California v. Ultimate Host, LLC, et al.
The Los Angeles Superior Court case number is:
23STCV19069
The case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
Did the Nightfall Group Lawsuit End in a Settlement?
Partially.
This is an important distinction.
In September 2025, three property-owner defendants connected to the lawsuit reached settlements with the City of Los Angeles.
The three defendants were:
- Kirill “Kirk” Ayzenberg
- 5554 Green Oak, LLC
- Jungle Kerry, Inc.
The settlements resulted in a combined $280,000 in civil penalties.
The individual amounts were reported as:
| Defendant | Civil Penalty |
| Kirill “Kirk” Ayzenberg | $215,000 |
| 5554 Green Oak, LLC | $45,000 |
| Jungle Kerry, Inc. | $20,000 |
| Total | $280,000 |
The settlements also included requirements concerning future use of the properties and warnings to guests about prohibited loud or unruly parties.
Is the Nightfall Group Case Completely Over?
No.
This is one of the most important facts for anyone searching “Nightfall Group lawsuit 2026.”
The settlements involving the three property owners did not resolve every issue involving every defendant.
Reporting on the case states that litigation involving other defendants remained pending. The Los Angeles Times also reported in September 2025 that litigation with other defendants was still pending.
Therefore, it would be inaccurate to say that the entire Nightfall Group lawsuit was settled for $280,000.
The $280,000 figure relates to the three property-owner settlements.
What Happened to Mokhtar Jabli?
Mokhtar Jabli, identified as the owner and operator of Nightfall Group, was named as a defendant in the Los Angeles City Attorney’s lawsuit.
The allegations against him and the company were connected to the alleged operation of illegal short-term rentals and party houses.
The available reporting indicates that the settlements with the three property owners did not resolve the entire case against Jabli and Ultimate Host/Nightfall.
It is important not to describe the allegations as proven misconduct unless a court ultimately makes such a finding.
Was Nightfall Group Also Involved in a Miami Beach Lawsuit?
Yes.
There is another legal matter involving The Nightfall Group, LLC, this time in Miami Beach, Florida.
The City of Miami Beach filed a nuisance case in 2023 involving a property where authorities alleged repeated violations associated with parties and short-term rental activity.
The case included The Nightfall Group as a defendant.
A consent decree resolved the city’s claims against Nightfall Group in that particular matter. The court document identifies the defendant as The Nightfall Group, LLC, also known as Ultimate Host LLC.
The Miami Herald reported that Nightfall Group agreed to pay the city a $250 fine as part of the settlement involving the property.
This Miami case is separate from the Los Angeles lawsuit.
Nightfall Group and Short-Term Rental Laws
The Los Angeles case highlights a broader issue involving short-term rentals.
Cities such as Los Angeles have adopted rules designed to control how residential properties can be rented to short-term guests.
These rules can address:
- Registration
- Primary-residence requirements
- Maximum rental periods
- Noise
- Occupancy
- Parties
- Advertising
- Neighborhood impacts
The dispute involving Nightfall illustrates the legal risks that can arise when luxury homes are used for frequent short-term stays or large gatherings in residential neighborhoods.
Did the Lawsuit Say Nightfall Had Hundreds of Properties?
Yes.
The Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office said the company operated through hundreds of properties rented on a short-term basis and alleged that this contributed significantly to the city’s party-house problem.
The city also cited more than 250 police calls to Nightfall-associated properties in the Hollywood area over the preceding two years.
Those numbers came from the city’s allegations and statements when the lawsuit was filed.
They should therefore be presented as allegations or government-reported figures rather than as a court determination of wrongdoing by every property associated with Nightfall.
What Is the Nightfall Group Lawsuit Status in 2026?
As of August 2026, the clearest picture is:
- The original Los Angeles enforcement case was filed in August 2023.
- The case alleged violations of Los Angeles short-term rental and party-house laws.
- Three property-owner defendants settled in September 2025.
- Those settlements produced $280,000 in combined civil penalties.
- The settlements did not resolve the entire litigation.
- Litigation involving other defendants, including the core Nightfall/Ultimate Host defendants, has been reported as pending.
There are also separate legal matters involving entities associated with Nightfall, including commercial disputes.
For example, a Los Angeles County Superior Court case filed in December 2023 involved Julian Buckner doing business as Vesta Home v. Mokhtar Jabli doing business as The Nightfall Group, categorized as a commercial breach-of-contract case.
A separate 2025 case also lists Ultimate Host LLC, The Nightfall Group LLC and Nightfall Realty, Inc. as defendants in a commercial lawsuit.
These cases should not be combined with the Los Angeles City’s party-house enforcement action because they involve different plaintiffs and legal issues.
Is Nightfall Group a Criminal Case?
The major Los Angeles City Attorney matter discussed here is a civil enforcement action, not a criminal prosecution.
That distinction matters.
A civil lawsuit can seek remedies such as:
- Civil penalties
- Injunctions
- Restrictions on business activity
- Compliance requirements
- Abatement of alleged nuisances
It does not mean that the defendant has been criminally convicted.
Does the Lawsuit Mean Nightfall Group Was Found Guilty?
No.
A civil lawsuit begins with allegations.
The Los Angeles City Attorney alleged that Nightfall and other defendants violated city ordinances and other laws. Some defendants later settled claims, while the broader litigation continued.
A settlement generally resolves disputed claims without necessarily constituting an admission of liability.
Therefore, articles about the case should use terms such as “alleged,” “the city claimed,” and “according to the complaint” when describing disputed allegations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Nightfall Group lawsuit?
It primarily refers to a 2023 Los Angeles civil enforcement case against Ultimate Host LLC, doing business as The Nightfall Group, its owner/operator Mokhtar Jabli and several property owners. The city alleged illegal short-term rental activity and party-house violations.
How much was the Nightfall Group settlement?
Three property-owner defendants settled for a combined $280,000 in civil penalties in 2025. This was not a $280,000 settlement of the entire Nightfall Group case.
Is the Nightfall Group lawsuit still active?
The available 2026 reporting indicates that the litigation was not completely resolved by the 2025 settlements and that claims involving other defendants remained pending.
Who owns Nightfall Group?
The Los Angeles lawsuit identifies Mokhtar Jabli as the owner and operator of Ultimate Host, LLC, doing business as The Nightfall Group.
Was Nightfall Group sued in Miami?
Yes. The Nightfall Group was also involved in a separate Miami Beach nuisance case concerning short-term rental and party-house allegations. That matter was resolved through a consent decree, with Nightfall agreeing to a $250 fine in the case reported by the Miami Herald.
Bottom Line
The Nightfall Group lawsuit is primarily a Los Angeles civil enforcement case concerning allegations that Ultimate Host, LLC, doing business as The Nightfall Group, operated short-term rentals in violation of Los Angeles regulations and that some properties were used as disruptive party houses.
The Los Angeles City Attorney filed the case in August 2023 under Case No. 23STCV19069. The city alleged more than 250 police responses to Nightfall-associated properties in the Hollywood area during the preceding two years.
In September 2025, three property-owner defendants settled for a combined $280,000 in civil penalties. However, that settlement did not resolve the entire lawsuit. Reporting available in 2026 indicates that litigation involving other defendants remained pending.
There are also separate legal matters involving Nightfall-related entities in California and Florida, so readers should avoid treating every “Nightfall Group lawsuit” search result as referring to the same case.
For an SEO article, the safest approach is to clearly distinguish the 2023 Los Angeles lawsuit, the 2025 $280,000 partial settlements, and the separate Miami Beach case, rather than presenting them as one single settlement or judgment.